🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a ban on sending national guard in the Oregon city, after a latest legal decision.

Appeals Court Agrees to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an larger group of eleven justices. The court also overturned a earlier ruling from a three-judge panel that had sided with the administration.

Legal Saga Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest development in a protracted court case over whether the administration has the authority and valid reason to deploy national guard forces in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was started in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has claimed that federal officials at the immigration center in the southern part of the city were facing threats, while city and state officials maintain that local officers have control of the circumstances.

Contrary to descriptions of Portland as “war ravaged”, locals have been sharing videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in Portland issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federalization of the state troops, and another prohibiting the deployment of any military personnel in the state, after efforts to evade the first order by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the physical sending of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under consideration simultaneously – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that facts are important and that the courts are working to hold this administration accountable. The founding document limits the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the president cannot dispatch the armed forces into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our fight continues in the courts.”